Free-2-Play goes live on September 29th! Phase to of the beta launches September 3rd.
PDX Murderous Moppets News
Clan news and stuffs!
Who We Are
- PDX Murderous Moppets
- We're a like minded clan of gamers from the Portland metro area of the state of Oregon, USA. While we're based in Portland, we do have members from all over! So, don't be afraid to join! We tend to play many different games and we have guild chapters all over! We might even be playing a game you love!
Thursday, September 3, 2015
Wildstar Free-2-Play Launches Sept. 29th!
Free-2-Play goes live on September 29th! Phase to of the beta launches September 3rd.
Sunday, July 5, 2015
Thursday, February 26, 2015
REVIEW: U Watch U8 Plus Smartwatch
Review: U Watch U8 Plus Smartwatch
By: Christopher “Synther” Wilson
MSRP: $32.03 http://www.gearbest.com/smart-watches/pp_126176.html
The wearables market is still in its infancy and is
mostly dominated by hands-free Bluetooth headsets. But there are other wearable devices coming
out. First it was the experiment with
Google Glass that fell flat on its face (snicker...snort…) and then came the
Smartwatch. Smartwatch sales are off to
a slow start with only 700,000 units shipping in 2014. The reason for this is threefold: 1.) Price. Smartwatches and wearables in general, are astronomically
overpriced versus their functionality.
2.) Functionality. They simply
don’t do enough on their own to justify their high price and there are no must
have apps. 3.) People and their strange
sense of privacy. This is honestly the
most perplexing of the three. People go
on and on about how wearables allow others to invade their privacy and then
turn around and use a credit card to purchase their groceries. Fully knowing that their credit card allows
for manufacturers and stores to track their purchases and…you guessed it…invade
their privacy. I’m not going to directly
say that people are stupid…but if the tinfoil hat fits…
The U Watch U8 nails the first problem by keeping the price down to a minimum. The second problem is debatable and I still do not find any “must have apps” on the watch, but the price is low enough for the functionality that it at least evens out. And the U8 doesn’t have a camera, so people can tuck their tinfoil hats back into the pizza box where they belong.
The U Watch U8 nails the first problem by keeping the price down to a minimum. The second problem is debatable and I still do not find any “must have apps” on the watch, but the price is low enough for the functionality that it at least evens out. And the U8 doesn’t have a camera, so people can tuck their tinfoil hats back into the pizza box where they belong.
The
U8 comes with a number of functions built in and a number of functions can be
added via the Android 2.3 or higher app.
Apple iOS users will be out of luck for the additional functions, which
consist of notification pushes from literally ALL of your apps. The watch connects to your phone via
Bluetooth and will then sync the date/time.
It will push phone calls and SMS natively and push other app
notifications via the Android app. The
U8’s home screen consists of five pages that can be swiped to either left or
right with four functions per page, not unlike the screen on your phone.
Some of the more useful functions of the
watch are direct access to your phonebook from your wrist, making or receiving
calls directly from your wrist (or denying calls), reading SMS messages, seeing
who sent you an email and the subject, reading Facebook IM messages, or any
plethora of other notification messages.
And, of course, checking the time and date.
Unlike
some of the more expensive Smartwatches running Android natively, you only get
four watch faces available on the U8.
These consist of two analog and two digital faces. The default digital watch face has direct
access to the phone dialer, pedometer, and Bluetooth. Unfortunately, these three functions cannot
be changed and I’m hard pressed to find a reason why I would want direct access
to my Bluetooth from the watch face. I
feel that access to the Phonebook or even the Sleep Monitor would have been a
more useful button to place on this watch face.
The only other complaint that I have about the digital watch faces is
that you can change the time format from 12-hour to 24-hour but there is no way
to change the date format. Instead, the
date format is permanently set to “military/international” format with the
day/month/year rather than month/day/year.
This is really only a problem in the United States because we’re the
only ones that want the month first. Still,
I feel that there is enough of a market that this should have been an option.
The analog watch faces are fairly elegant and remind me a
lot of a
Seiko and Bulova watch. They maintain an
elegant and minimalist watch face and may be a bit more of use for dressing up
or just for people that prefer an analog watch.
The bottom of the watch consists of three buttons. From left to right: Apps, Volume, and
Back. On the right side of the watch,
you’ll find a physical “Home” button that powers on/off the watch as well as
brings it to life from standby. I’ve
found that the Volume option has multiple functions. One controls the volume of the watch itself
while another controls the volume of apps and voice calls. But there is no real indication of which is
which. It’s a little hard to explain,
but you’ll find the functionality of it once you power the watch off at night
and it does it’s little song and dance saying “ByeBye” in a room with a couple
of sleeping people. You may want to turn
that down to the 2 or 0 setting. It’s
loud.
As I mentioned in passing, the U8 Plus also includes
native apps for a Pedometer (passometer) and a Sleep Monitor. These can tie into the Android app and give
you a fairly detailed look at your “workout” or the quality of your sleep. The U8, apparently, has a motion tracker in
the wrist to accomplish these feats but it is fairly simplistic. The Pedometer allows you to adjust the width
of your step but I’ve found that it seems to over calculate the number of steps
taken. For example: The mailboxes in my
apartment complex are maybe a block from the front door of my apartment. While I suppose it is possibly accurate, I
find it hard to believe that I took 597 steps one way to get to the
mailbox. I also noted that the Pedometer
will register steps just by shaking your wrist.
So, I find it to be a good tool for at least showing you that you’re
doing something, but don’t expect a lot of accuracy from it. It can still be a fun gadget though. The Sleep Monitor seems to work on the
opposite effect and assumes that if you don’t move, then you must be
sleeping. By this regard, if you play
Eve Online and wear the watch on your left wrist, it would
have to register you as being in a coma.
Or if you roll around a lot in your sleep, you will be told you have had
little sleep. Again, a fun gadget, but
not very accurate.
Packaged with the U Watch U8 is a short USB cable, thus
allowing you to charge the Smartwatch, and a watch band removal tool. This is a nice little bonus, since the U8 can
take any 22mm watch band. The band that
comes with the watch is a fairly good padded neoprene but if you want something
a little classier (and less sweaty) you have a plethora of options
available. The U8 Plus is also “life
water” resistant. This means that you
shouldn’t worry if you get some rain on it or a little water from washing your
hands, but don’t wear it in the shower or dunk your wrist in a bucket of water. I’ve found that battery life will last
anywhere from 18 to 28 hours, depending on how many notifications you receive
or how many apps you have vibrating your wrist.
I found two “Easter eggs” in the U8 that I have yet to
fully explore further. The first is that
you can’t reply to SMS messages directly from the watch. However, when the message first comes in and
displays, you can hit the Apps button and a “Reply” is on the menu. But this option does not come up when you go
to the Messages app. Tapping on Reply
produces a keyboard that consists of about five or six letter and is clearly
incomplete. A friend of mine and I suspect
that if you have voice to text enabled on your phone, you could likely speak to
the watch and send a text this way.
However, I’ve yet to try this.
The second “Easter egg” was found when I plugged the U8
into my PC to charge it. The U8 does not
come with a replaceable battery, so there was no reason to pull the back off
the watch. When plugged into a PC, the
U8 comes up as a USB hard drive with no memory card inserted. This causes the little techy voice in my head
to tell me to pull the back off and see if there is a slot for a micro SD. That could be a pretty cool way to pack your
personal files around! But, again, I’ve
yet to explore this further.
In conclusion, I have to say that the U Watch U8 Plus is
a great little Smartwatch that functions exactly as I would need it to
function. I get to feel a little like
Dick Tracey talking into my wrist, hang up on people with amazing ease, and get
Twitter messages as needed without pulling out my phone. For functionality and price, I give the U8 a
6 out of 10 stars and recommend it to anyone that wants a little bit of hands
freedom from their Smartphone.
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Why Do We Receive Such Terrible Customer Service?
Title: Why do we receive such terrible customer service?
By: Christopher “Synther” Wilson
I have no flashy pictures of products to put up for this
one, which feels a little weird. But a
recent conversation really pinpointed the issue at hand and gave me some
insight into why we get such terrible customer service/technical support 75% of
the time we call a 1800 number. Believe
it or not, it isn’t because we’re all stupid.
And I find it hard to actually fully blame the poor guy reading from a
script on the other end of the phone.
The answer is simple: Customer Service management is a bunch of
imbeciles and the army of plebeians in the call center is receiving horrendous
training.
I don’t make this claim lightly. At one time I was the lead technical support
trainer for companies such as Netscape, @Home, and Gateway. This was all back when customer service actually
meant something and was handled correctly.
Today, customer service is seen more as a front line means to cover up
any mistakes by the company and defend the company’s position rather than to
simply fix the end user’s problem. Very
few companies follow the number one rule to customer service/technical support:
When you answer the phone or respond to that email, own the issue and take
responsibility. God forbid that anyone
take any responsibility.
Look, I’ve got news for you. When you signed on to be a customer service
rep, you made it your job to always be at fault and to fix it. That’s your job. Period.
It isn’t to upsell the end user to a more expensive package, it isn’t to
defend the company, and it isn’t to put any blame on the end user. Own it and take responsibility. The second rule is to never, ever, assume anything. Get the information, repeat the information
back to the end user, and work with that.
Don’t assume you know something that hasn’t been told to you. The third rule is to ask close ended questions. Avoid open ended questions like, “how are you
doing today?” This simply leads to a
diatribe of useless information you don’t need.
Be on point and stick to the topic at hand.
I bring this all up because I just witnessed higher end
reps for a fairly large gaming company do exactly the opposite of good customer
service. Then, when I called them on it,
I was basically told that I was not only wrong but that they didn’t see the
difference in how things were handled.
Now they’ve not only handled the issue in a grossly incorrect manner,
they’ve compounded it by then trying to defend their completely inept handling of
it. It’s really rather amazing that
anyone in customer service can either be this stupid or have such low willpower
that they’ve been indoctrinated to tow the company line on such a level. Let alone to hear this from people that claim
to be “lead reps” for said company.
For your edification, here is the incorrect way of
handling customer service, just so that we’re on the same page.
WRONG
WRONG
Customer contacts you via phone, email, or on a forum and
states that their account was hacked.
They’ve had numerous fraudulent charges placed on their credit/debit
card.
Rep: “We
recommend all users enable two stage authentication on their accounts.”
Rep:
“I’ll
get you in touch with teir 2 support, since teir 1 is rarely able to give out
more information on the nature of this issue and is more suited for handling
fraudulent charges.”
So, why was this wrong?
The initial response of telling the customer that it is recommended that
two stage authentication is enabled puts the blame on the customer. As a customer service rep, you signed up to
be at fault and to fix it. Victim
blaming for a hack of your network is not
taking ownership and it is certainly not
taking responsibility. Whether or not
the customer had two stage authentication enabled or if they used the same
password on multiple sites/clients is not your issue and is it not your place
to assume that this is what happened. You
never, ever, start a customer
service call by blaming the victim for what has happened to them. Not only was this standard customer
service/technical support training, any moron would know that this is simply
common sense.
The second part of the response may be correct in some
situations. However, in a lot of ways it
feels like the rep is simply passing the buck.
“You do what you can until you can’t do any more, then you pass it up to
tier 2,” is the usual rule on this. If
the standard procedure is to pass fraudulent charges up to tier 2, then by all
means waste no time in doing so.
If you did the above and are unable to see how badly you
handled this situation after it is pointed out to you, head directly to a
doctor with an MRI machine to make sure you have a brain in your skull.
Almost immediately after having viewed this absolutely
disgusting display of customer service, I was fortunate enough to actually
receive good customer service. Not just
good, but outstanding! So, here is the correct
way of doing customer service, so that we have a way of seeing the difference.
RIGHT
Customer contacts you via phone/email/or on a forum to
state that they have downloaded the new driver for your company’s hardware but
that the driver will not install correctly.
The driver never gets to a point where it detects the hardware, but claims
it has installed. It then promptly fails
to operate properly.
Rep: “We’re
sorry you’re having these issues. The
driver was just released last night and it looks like the wrong file was put up
on the server. Here is a link to the
correct driver. Can you please download
the driver again?”
Rep:
“If
you are continuing to have issues with the driver, can you tell me what the
filename of the download is? What
version of Windows are you using?”
What did the rep do correctly here? They took responsibility for the issue by
immediately apologizing for any issues.
They took ownership of the issue by admitting that the incorrect file
was placed on the server. They then gave
a 99% probability of fixing the issue by offering a link to the correct
file. The rep then gets bonus points for
following up the initial statement by offering further assistance should the
new download fail to install properly and by asking closed ended questions to
help further his knowledge of what is going on.
This was a masterful display of how to do customer service/technical
support correctly. And it did solve the
issue. Total call time: 5 minutes.
Companies like Comcast and EA have gained reputations, if
not awards, for being the worst companies in America for the simple reason
that they fail time and again to follow the first three rules of customer
service. Sure, they have some dirty back
end deals that you don’t find out about until later, but the initial reason is
because they have terrible customer service.
And then they back up that terrible customer service by having leads or
managers that attempt to defend their terrible customer service. In most cases, you can screw your customers
all you want as long as you apologize for it and take ownership on the phone
when they call you.
I just gave these companies a plainly drawn road map on
how to fix their terrible reputation. I
doubt they’ll use it because the people in charge are more concerned with being
right than fixing the end user’s issues or how to properly conduct business. I hope they enjoy getting more awards.
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
REVIEW: Revisiting the PRO DSE901 E-Cigarette
Review: Revisiting the AquaVapor PRO DSE901
By: Christopher “Synther” Wilson
It will be two years in February that I quit
smoking. But not just quit. I was able to quit in three days flat. This after having been a pack, to a pack and a
half, a day smoker for 24 years. This is
after having tried patches, gums, lozenges, and a trial of Chantix. Patches irritated my skin. Gums taste terrible. Lozenges taste terrible. Chantix made me moody and depressed. And none of them killed the urge to
smoke. But the AquaVapor PRO DSE901 and
a 10ml bottle of 24mg strength AquaVMax Cocoa Mint eLiquid was able to get me
off cigarettes in three days.
There were some white knuckle moments in those three
days, no doubt. Day three in particular
seemed to be pure torture and there were times that I thought I was going to
melt my e-cigarette from over use. But
it held up and things were actually exceptionally easy after that. But it should be noted that e-cigarettes of
any kind are not a smoking cessation
device. They are an alternate form
of nicotine ingestion. The biggest key to not smoking cigarettes anymore is to tell yourself, “I’m not quitting. I’m simply doing this now instead of smoking.”
No doubt, getting involved with a fantastic local community, the support of friends, the support of my wife and family, and getting into bigger and better mods as a hobby has had its own effect on helping me too. But two years ago I was a total noob to all this and doing research was difficult because it was really just coming out.
No doubt, getting involved with a fantastic local community, the support of friends, the support of my wife and family, and getting into bigger and better mods as a hobby has had its own effect on helping me too. But two years ago I was a total noob to all this and doing research was difficult because it was really just coming out.
E-cigarettes have been around for almost eight years but
they really busted out onto the scene about two and a half years ago when Blu
started to flood the market with their kit.
I wanted something that felt like a cigarette and a pack that would
recharge the batteries. But after some
research and cost analysis, I found that the Blu e-cigarette really wasn’t that
great of a deal. Instead I settled on
the AquaVapor PRO DSE901. The diameter
of the PRO feels like a cigarette in the fingers, the drip tip is akin to a
Swisher Sweet cigarillo, and the charging case feels like a pack of
cigarettes. Vapor production is an
adequate recreation of an analog cigarette.
Don’t expect huge unrealistic clouds of vapor with this. The entire package does an excellent job of
recreating the smoking experience.
Over the course of these two years, I’ve upgraded a few
times. First it was to Ego style
e-cigarettes with CE4/5/6 tanks. Then it
was to a variable wattage Ego style battery.
Then it was to a Smoktech SID variable wattage device with 18650
batteries. And now my normal device is a
Nemesis mechanical mod and rebuildable atomizers. But every now and then I come back to my PRO
DSE901. It’s elegant, sleek, and
small. It fits inside a jacket pocket
without feeling like two rolls of quarters.
And with the 2000mAh battery in the PCC (Personal Charging Case) pack,
it does a pretty good job of lasting me throughout most of the day. Two years later and I would call myself “an
advanced vaper,” yet this kit that I started with still works just as well for
me as any of my mods.
The standard PRO DSE901 is a three part device with the
battery, atomizer, and drip tip cartridge.
What I didn’t know two years ago is that in its normal configuration,
the PRO is really what we call a dripper.
This means you drip in e-liquid until the polyfill in the drip tip cartridge
is saturated and wet, then put the tip on and vape for about eight to twelve
puffs. You then pull the drip tip off
and drip in some more e-liquid to top it off and you’re ready to go again. This is normal use. The reason I didn’t know this two years ago is
because there was, and still is, a lot of miscommunication on all sides of
vaping.
Two and half years ago, it was common advertising
practice for companies to state that their e-cigarette cartridges were equal to
a certain number of analog cigarettes.
When the Blu first came out, it was often stated that one cartridge was
the same as an entire pack of cigarettes.
Later that changed to about a half a pack of cigarettes. Then they started saying that each cartridge
was equal to a certain number of puffs.
All of this is complete crap.
First, there’s no real mathematical way of calculating how many analogue
cigarettes are in an e-cigarette cartridge.
It’s simply not possible. Even if
you calculated the amount of nicotine in a particular brand of analogue
cigarette, multiplied that by 20 cigarettes in a pack, and then put that much
into a cartridge, you still would not have an accurate reading of number of
cigarettes per cartridge. This is
because of the second reason: puff counts.
The average vaper will take a five to six second puff on an
e-cigarette. A puff on an analogue cigarette
is usually only around three seconds and that’s considered a pretty big
drag. The length of your puff directly
relates to how much e-liquid is vaporized.
And last, there is the fact that your body is addicted to a lot more
than just nicotine with analogue cigarettes.
There are close to 7000 chemicals involved between what is used in
making the cigarette to what is released when you inhale. An e-cigarette has only four or five and,
other than the nicotine, they’re all food grade materials. The end result is that you’re going to be
puffing on that e-cigarette a lot more than you do on analogue cigarettes, at
least initially.
Companies have since given up on equating their
cartridges to analogue cigarettes, unless you press them. Unfortunately, the idea of this has stuck in
the public’s mind and it still comes up with people that are either new to
vaping or from the completely clueless. On
the vaper’s side of things, they tend to spread misinformation as well. And they tend to do it with alarming
regularity. Usually this comes in the
form of elitism. “You’re not a real
vaper because you’re using a cig-a-like and I’m using a mod. Everyone knows that cig-a-likes are
crap! Get a real mod, noob.” This kind of thing is pretty common, though
totally incorrect and does nothing to help people that are new to vaping or to
those that simply like the smaller size of a “standard” e-cigarette. The last source of misinformation is from
disreputable journalists from questionable “news” sources that say things like,
“E-cigarettes Contain 10 Times More Carcinogens Than Regular Cigarettes.” They post things like this with absolutely no
links to the original research. And if
they did post links to the original research, the questions of A.) How was this
research conducted? B.) What eLiquids
were used? C.) Where were those e-liquids
made? D.) What generation of device did
you use (using an e-cigarette designed and made in 2007 will yield radically
different results than an e-cigarette designed and made in 2014)? Claiming things like, “e-cigarette vapor was
found to contain more formaldehyde than regular cigarettes,” makes one wonder
where this imaginary formaldehyde could have come from. Formaldehyde doesn’t just magically come into
creation because you vaporized a mixture of Propylene Glycol, Vegetable
Glycerin, Nicotine, and food grade flavor additives. It is simply impossible. So this one statement immediately brings into
question how this research was conducted, since the statement makes it obvious
that their testing lab was not setup as a clean environment or they were
testing e-liquids of questionable make.
The end result of all this is that while there is more
information available to people that want to start vaping, the problem hasn’t
changed overall. Two years ago, I found
a lack of information and today the information is buried under a pile of virtual
bullshit. All of which the politicians
are more than ready to weave into their particular agenda. If it is about e-cigarettes and you heard it
from a politician, it’s probably a lie.
We’re talking about people that can’t even explain how the internet
works (it’s a series of tubes, right?) or are willing to block something like
Net Neutrality and attempt to convince you that it hinders economic
growth. Can you really expect to believe
them on this? Of course not.
Since there seem to be a lot of self-proclaimed elitists
on the internet, allow me to be the first to tell you that if you want an
e-cigarette that is relatively close to the smoking experience, get the
AquaVapor PRO DSE901. As I stated, it’s
a dripper but if you don’t like dripping there are upgrades available. The first of these is in the form of
cartomizers. Cartomizers are basically
the same as the cartridges you’ll find on Blu, NJoy, or any number of other
e-cigarettes. These are cartridges that
contain a coil that is surrounded by polyfill.
You fill them until the polyfill is saturated, blow out the excess, and
put it on the battery. This effectively
makes the PRO a two part device.
Personally, I find cartomizers to be a complete pain in the ass. They’re messy, the way they vape is hit or miss
(one is fantastic, another one out of the same box vapes like crap), they leak
in the PCC pack out the air hole, etc.
However, there are those that absolutely love them. They’re not expensive so I can only recommend
that you try them out and see for yourself.
I can say that they do have a harsher throat hit, so if that is
something you are looking for, cartomizers may be for you.
The next upgrade option is to get a DSE901-T tank
atomizer. These keep the three part
design of the PRO, but the atomizer is built with a small spike in the center
of it rather than the stainless steel mesh bridge of the standard
atomizer. The spike pushes into the tank
cartridge, which contains about 0.8ml of liquid, and feeds the liquid directly
to the coil. If you want less fiddling
and you don’t want to drip to top off your e-cig, these work fantastic. I recommend the low resistance (1.7 ohm)
version from Value Vapor.
The most recent creation is the Kanger T4
clearomizer. These turn your PRO DSE901
into a two piece design and hold 1ml of e-liquid. AquaVapor has these available in 5-packs in low
resistance (1.8 ohm).
For flavor and vapor production, I still prefer the
standard DSE901 atomizer and drip tip cartridge. I don’t mind dripping and I’m used to
it. And if I had known that this was the
proper way of using the PRO, I’d have had a much easier time. One thing that I can suggest is replacing the
polyfill in the DSE901 cartridges with organic cotton. It’s a simple process and a single cotton
ball will likely fill all five cartridges in a pack. I find that the vapor production is a bit
better and your cartridges will last longer because you just replace the cotton
when it gets worn out. Aside from the cotton
ball, you’ll need some tweezers and about five minutes of time.
You can purchase the PRO DSE901 PCC kit from AquaVapor
for $59.99 plus shipping. Tell them that
I recommended it to you and write your own review for them if you like it. I do suggest getting the kit with manual
batteries instead of the automatic batteries.
Manual batteries are sealed and will last you much longer, while
automatic batteries allow activation when inhaled but are unsealed and subject
to damage from leaks.
For e-liquid flavors it is hard for me to make too many
recommendations because it is all about your subjective taste. But there are a few brands that I like and I
can highly recommend. There are some
rather general flavors that I can offer, as well.
Mt.
Baker Vapor
These guys offer some of the best e-liquids around with
the best flavors I’ve found and with the best prices anywhere. You can specify the mixture of Propylene
Glycol (PG) and Vegetable Glycerin (VG), the Nicotine strength, and add up to
five additional flavor shots (beware…5 extra shots is usually way too
much). I’ve found that a 50/50 mix of
PG/VG produces good vapor with excellent flavor, two extra shots of flavor is
about right for me, and 12mg strength keeps me pretty satisfied. Recommended
flavors: Thug Juice, Hawk Sauce (the official flavor of Seahawks fans),
Afternoon Delight, Peach Rings, Butterscotch, Candy Cane, Grappler.
Northwest
Vapors
Yet another company that offers excellent flavor and fair
prices. I usually get Regular (Medium
VG) mixture, 12mg strength. Recommended flavors: DAKool Menthol, True
Tobacco, Gummy Peach, Peppermint, Vanilla Smokey, Strawberry Overdose.
AquaVMax
These e-liquids tend to be a little stronger in nicotine
and are a little more expensive but are excellent. All of these e-liquids are a 50/50 PG/VG
mixture and I usually order them in the 18mg strength, since there is no 12mg
option. Recommended flavors: Cocoa Mint, Cinna Twist, Apple Pie, Cubana,
Carolina Leaf, Georgia Special, Menthandy (which is good when mixed with
Georgia Special for a very pleasant menthol cigarette…menthol hack!).
Almost two years running and I can go from my Nemesis
mech mod with a sub-ohm build Patriot RDA, pick up my PRO DSE901, and be
perfectly happy. It is an excellent
device that is well built and continues to operate as if it were brand
new. If that doesn’t state how highly
recommended this kit is, I’m not sure what else I can say about it.
Saturday, November 8, 2014
Saturday, October 11, 2014
DOES GAMES JOURNALISM HAVE A LIBERAL BIAS PROBLEM?
An excellent piece done by The Bright Side of News.
GAMERGATE: DOES GAMES JOURNALISM HAVE A LIBERAL BIAS PROBLEM?
GAMERGATE: DOES GAMES JOURNALISM HAVE A LIBERAL BIAS PROBLEM?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)